|
Before doing these problems, you'll need to have studied sections 26-3 and 4. Those sections provide a guide for tracing rays for convex and concave mirrors and for doing quantitative calculations. We'll do an example here.
Solution: Three principal rays (P, F, and C) have been traced from the tip of the object as per the discussion in the text. Their intersection is the tip of the image. The image is real (light rays actually converge there), inverted, and smaller than the object. Taking measurements directly from the diagram (grid units of centimeters), we have: f = 4.0 cm Note the positive signs on object and image distances, indicating that they're both on the reflecting side of the mirror. Note also the negative sign on the image size, indicating that it's inverted. Let's check to see if the measured distances agree with known quantitative relationships. We should have do/di = -ho/hi. We'll calculate each ratio separately and then compare. do/di = 11.0/5.8 = 1.9 The results agree to 2 significant figures.
1/do + 1/di = 1/11.0 + 1/5.8 = 0.19 The results differ by about 15%. This can be attributed partly to error in the drawing but primarily to approximations made in deriving the mirror equation. See page 856 for how the approximations are implemented. They lead to the result f = ½R. That's the way we drew the diagram above. Let's see how close that result is. The diagram to right is drawn correctly using the law of reflection. The incident ray striking the mirror at point D is reflected at an angle equal to the angle of incidence. Notice that the angles are measured with respect to the line CD, which is a radius of the circular arc of the mirror as well as a normal to the mirror's surface. The reflected ray passes through the true focal point, f'. The approximated focal point is f. The error is certainly significant and can explain the discrepancy that we found above. When doing ray tracing problems quantitatively, we don't normally take measurements from constructions such as we did above. Instead, we simply use the two relationships: do/di = -ho/hi and 1/do + 1/di = 1/f. In the problems to follow, you'll make ray tracings to locate the image. However, you'll use the quantitative relationships in order to obtain numerical results.
The problems are from Chapter 26 (both 2nd and 3rd editions): 21,22--This pair is about the
same situation. One problem is to make the ray tracing and the other
to solve quantitatively. |