Rubber Band Stretching

by Allie Landry, Matthew Drews, and Wayne Kimball, Jr.

 
 
 
Home
Method
Analysis
Photo Journal
Video Gallery
Discussion of Results
Conclusion
Contact Us
 


Rubber Band Stretching

Results

	Graphical Analysis produced an unexpected graph that gave us a scare that our experiment had been
a failure. It showed too much variation in our data for us to state any real conclusion. The average 
distance traveled by our BB was around 9cm. As you can see from our graph, the BB fluctuated drastically from
the mean. 
	This variation could have come from a number of sources. Firstly, it was necessary for the BB to hit 
the center of the rubber band. It if hit to the left/right, the rubber band would not offer enough resistance, and
the BB would slip off the side even if the rubber band could stretch more. Hitting the BB too high or low would 
have the same effect as if we shortened the rubber band to the length of the shorter half. Thus, the rubber 
band would have greater resistance. Switching the rubber band between some trials also could have introduced
variation. The different rubber bands could have different widths, thicknesses, stretch properties, etc., causing 
the maximum horizontal stretch to change. In one of our graphs we have marked where we changed the rubber
bands to demonstrate the effect of the change. In the parts of the graph that had the same rubber band, you 
can tell that there was not a significant difference between different trials. The most drastic changes occurred
where rubber band changes occurred. The placement of the BB when it hits makes the graph look randomly 
scattered. Overuse of a rubber band could have also introduced an unexpected variable. Overuse would result in
a permanent stretch in the rubber band, making it more fragile to breaks and offer less resistance the the BB. 
 

 

 
 
  © Copyright 2007. All Rights Reserved. Website by The Stretchers