this week's questions come from the reading on neutron stars & pulsars [17-2 (B and E) & 18-5C]
1. In class Monday, we talked about Jocelyn Bell's serendipitous discovery of what are now called "pulsars." Suppose you discover, with your radio telescope (which is tuned to a particular reception frequency, as is a radio you might own), a source that varies in brightness with a very short period (say, 0.1 second). Of paramount interest is that the period is consistently the same (to within one part in 106 or 107, a precision heretofore realized only by human-made atomic clocks). Either you have discovered some new type of astronomical object or you have discovered the first communication from an alien intelligence. There are 5 things that you might do or try to distinguish between the 2 possibilities; can you come up with at least 3 good ones?
2. Suppose the sun (rotation period = 25 days) collapsed to a neutron star size. What would its rotation period be (in seconds)? [You don't have to give me all the intermediate steps, but at least give me the physics principle and the basic method you used.] Would this be short enough to account for the periods of known pulsars?
3. A supernova explosion can only happen if a neutron star is formed. Yet the vast majority of supernova remnants do not have a pulsar (a rotating neutron star) apparent inside of them. What might be the explanation for this absence? If you have done the reading on pulsars/neutron stars and supernovas, you should be able to come up with all 5 reasons.... but how about at least 3?
I did my own work on this JIT.
Click on the button to send the results to Kolena or click to start over.
[return to the Duke Astrophysics home page]